Home
Free Newsletter
Breakfast
Lose weight plan
Shop
Success stories
Exercise
Books
Get Started Now!
FAQ's
Testimonials
Weight loss
Eat healthy
Search & Links
News
Food and drink
Supplements
Work at home
Skin care
Quit smoking
Quit 4 UR Family
Contact me
Diet Review

XML RSS
What is this?
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Add to Google

News




Welcome to my new NEWS page. Every day I hope to update and include new stories for you to read and understand more about the link with Weight loss and Health.

The old saying "WE ARE WHAT WE EAT" is absolutely spot on. If we all want to enjoy better health and even a longer life we must start to change our eating habits.

When we are young we don't care, our bodies cope with all sorts of abuse. But as we age trouble is rarely far away, by eating a good balanced diet and supplementing with vitamins, minerals, protein and essential amino acids we will live longer as long as we don't continue to abuse our bodies. Email me now and receive my info pack about healthy but naughty living.

Email: robert@weightloss-world.com

or Telephone/Fax: (00 34) 952595907


Do Polyunsaturated Oils Increase
Cancer Risk and Heart Disease?



Is this the biggest health con of our generation?

Read and make up your own mind.


Up to the 19th-century, fat was relatively expensive and butter was a luxury. The poor lived mainly on potatoes and bread, which were cheap, supplemented whenever possible with whatever source of protein and fat they could afford.

Not surprisingly, mortality was high amongst the poorer classes. To fill the gap in the market cheap substitutes for butter began to be produced in the last quarter of the Victorian era. Made from cheaper fats and coloured yellow to mimic the look, if not the taste of butter, they were called margarine.

And this started, quite slowly at first, a radical change in the types of fat we, as a nation, ate.

Originally margarines were made of beef suet, milk and water. Later the recipes changed to include lard, whale oil and the oils of olive, coconut, ground nut and cottonseed. By the middle of the 20th-century an emulsion of soya bean and water was substituted for the milk and margarines could be made entirely of inexpensive oils from vegetable sources. In all these forms, margarine was the poor relation to butter.

In the 1920s a new disease had suddenly 'taken off' all over the industrialised world.

By the 1940s it had become a leading cause of premature death — and nobody knew why.

In 1950, an American scientist hypothesised that cholesterol might be to blame. (1)

In 1953, another American, Ancel Keys, compared levels of this disease in seven countries with the amounts of fat in those countries. (2)

And so was born the 'Diet-Heart' hypothesis, for the new disease was coronary heart disease.

To reduce the risk of a heart attack, Ancel Keys recommended cutting down on the vegetable oils and margarines. However, it was discovered that vegetable oils, which are composed largely of unsaturated fats and oils, tended to lower blood cholesterol levels, while saturated fats tended to raise them.

And by that time, it had been decided, largely by majority vote, (3) that raised cholesterol increased the risk of a heart attack.

With the advent of the 'Prudent Diet' in the USA in 1982, and COMA's introduction of 'healthy eating' in Britain two years later, the fats in our diet changed even more dramatically: we were told to avoid animal fats such as butter and lard, which have a larger proportion of saturated fats, in favour of largely polyunsaturated vegetable margarines and cooking oils.

Now margarines could be priced to rival butter. Recently, margarines have been developed specifically to lower cholesterol levels, and prices have risen again. Benecol, made from tree bark is considerably more expensive than butter.

Before going further, it might be as well for you to learn a little chemistry. This will make understanding how the different fats react under different circumstances. This is essential to understanding how cancers start or are promoted.

Margarine — a natural food?

The polyunsaturated fats used to make margarine are generally obtained from vegetable sources: sunflower seed, cottonseed, and soybean. As such they might be thought of as natural foods. Usually, however, they are pressed on the public in the form of highly processed margarines, spreads and oils and, as such, they are anything but natural.

In 1989, the petroleum-based solvent, benzene, that is known to cause cancer, was found in Perrier mineral water at a mean concentration of fourteen parts per billion.

This was enough to cause Perrier to be removed from supermarket shelves. The first process in the manufacture of margarine is the extraction of the oils from the seeds, and this is usually done using similar petroleum-based solvents.

Although these are then boiled off, this stage of the process still leaves about ten parts per million of the solvents in the product.

That is 700 times as much as fourteen parts per billion. Strangely that is considered safe and is allowed to left on our supermarket shelves.

The oils then go through more than ten other processes: degumming, bleaching, hydrogenation, neutralization, fractionation, deodorisation, emulsification, interesterification, . . . that include heat treatment at 140-160C with a solution of caustic soda; the use of nickel, a metal that is known to cause cancer, as a catalyst, with up to fifty parts per million of the nickel left in the product; the addition of antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisol (E320). These antioxidants are again usually petroleum based and are widely believed to cause cancer.

The hydrogenation process, that solidifies the oils so that they are spreadable, produces trans -fatty acids that rarely occur in nature.

The heat treatment alone is enough to render these margarines nutritionally inadequate. When the massive chemical treatment and unnatural fats are added, the end product can hardly be called either natural or healthy.

You may be interested in a list of the ingredients that may be present in butter and margarine:

Butter:

milk fat (cream), a little salt,

Margarine: (Deep breath)

Edible oils, edible fats, salt or potassium chloride, ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, phospholipids, tert-butylhydroquinone, mono- and di-glycerides of fat-forming fatty acids, disodium guanylate, diacetyltartaric and fatty acid esters of glycerol, Propyl, octyl or dodecyl gallate (or mixtures thereof), tocopherols, propylene glycol mono- and di-esters, sucrose esters of fatty acids, curcumin, annatto extracts, tartaric acid, 3,5,trimethylhexanal, ß-apo-carotenoic acid methyl or ethyl ester, skim milk powder, xanthophylls, canthaxanthin, vitamins A and D.

Dietary fat patterns

The total amount of fats in our diet today, according to the MAFF National Food Survey, is almost the same as it was at the beginning of the 20th century.

What has changed, to some extent, is the types of fats eaten. At the turn of the century we ate mainly animal fats that are largely saturated and monounsaturated. Now we are tending to eat more polyunsaturated fats — it's what we are advised to do.

In 1991, two studies, from USA (4) and Canada, (5) found that linoleic acid, the major polyunsaturated fatty acid found in vegetable oils, increased the risk of breast tumours. This, it seems, was responsible for the rise in the cancers noted in previous studies.

Experiments with a variety of fats showed that saturated fats did not cause tumours but, when small amounts of polyunsaturated vegetable oil or linoleic acid itself was added, this greatly increased the promotion of breast cancer.

Body cell walls are made of cholesterol, protein and fats. The graph below demonstrates that the human body's fat make-up is largely of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids.

We contain very little polyunsaturated fat. Cell walls have to allow the various nutrients that body cells need from the blood, but stop harmful pathogens. They must be stable. An intake of large quantities of polyunsaturated fatty acids changes the constituency of cholesterol and body fat. Cell walls become softer and more unstable.

Polyunsaturated fats suppress the immune system

Polyunsaturated fats (PUFs) are greatly immunosuppressive, and anything that suppresses the immune system is likely to cause cancer.

The first person to suggest that polyunsaturated fats cause cancer was Dr R A Newsholme of Oxford University, England. (6) What Newsholme wrote was that when our bodies get sufficient nutrition, our diet includes immunosuppressive PUFs which make us prone to infection by bacteria and viruses.

When we are starved, however, our body stores of PUFs are depleted. This allows our bodies' immune systems to recover which, in turn, allows us to fight existing infection and prevent other infections.

He was making the point that the immunosuppressive effects of PUFs in sunflower seeds are useful in treating autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, (7) and that the same fatty acids could be used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection of kidney transplants.

It was during the early days of kidney transplantation that doctors first encountered the problem of tissue rejection as their patients' bodies destroyed the alien transplanted kidneys. If transplantation were to be a success, they had to find a way to suppress the immune system.

Newsholme had said that there was no better way to immunosuppress a renal patient than with sunflower seed oil. So kidney transplant doctors fed their patients linoleic acid. (8) (Linoleic acid is the major polyunsaturated fatty acid in vegetable oils.)

But the transplant doctors were then astonished to see how quickly their patients developed cancers: some cancers were up to twenty times as frequent as was expected.

This was in line with heart trials using diets that were high in PUFs which, reported an excess of cancer deaths from as early as 1971. (9)

By the early 1980s, we were being exhorted by doctors and nutritionists to eat more PUFs because they were 'good for us' despite the fact that Oncology Times carried a paper in January 1980 from the University of California at Davis that mice fet PUFs were more prone to develop melanoma.

In May 1980, the same publication carried a similar report from Oregon State University which said that PUFs fed to cancer-prone mice increased the numbers of cancers formed.

In 1989 there was a report of a ten-year trial at a Veterans' Administration Hospital in Los Angeles. In this trial half the patients were fed a diet which had double the amount of PUFs as compared to saturated fats.

In the half of the patients on the high PUF diet there was a fifteen percent increase in cancer deaths compared to the saturated fat group. (10)

The authors of the report said that the PUFs had been the cause of the increase in cancer deaths. The British Medical Journal carried an editorial in its 6 October 1973 issue which asked if PUFs were carcinogenic. It came to the conclusion that they were.

Wayne Martin likes to tell a story which suggests just how cancer-causing are PUFs. In 1930 in the USA, eighty percent of men smoked cigarettes and the tar content of cigarettes was much higher than it is today.

The death rate at that time from lung cancer was very low. In 1955 doctors decided that PUFs were good in terms of heart disease protection. After this lung cancer deaths increased dramatically.

By 1980 although the number of American men who smoked had dropped to only thirty percent, three times as much PUF was being eaten — and there were sixty times as many lung cancer deaths. (11)

In 1990, Martin called Newsholme's Oxford University office but by then Newsholme had retired. Martin spoke to his successor to find that they were still treating autoimmune diseases with PUFs.

By then they were using fish oil. The doctor said the reason for the fish oil was that the degree of immunosuppression increased with the degree of unsaturation and fish oil was much more unsaturated than sunflower oil.

Martin asked the doctor why they were not talking about PUFs causing cancer. The doctor replied that if he did that he would be run out of Oxford.

Carcinogens — background radiation, ultraviolet radiation from the sun, particles in the air we breathe and the food we eat — continually attack us all.

Normally, the immune system deals with any small focus of cancer cells so formed and that is the end of it. But linoleic acid suppresses the immune system. With a high intake of margarine, therefore, a tumour may grow too rapidly for the weakened immune system to cope thus increasing our risk of a cancer.

Polyunsaturated fats and skin cancer

Since 1974, the increase of polyunsaturated fats has been blamed for the alarming increase in malignant melanoma (skin cancer) in Australia. (12)

We are all told that the sun causes it. Are Australians going out in the sun any more now than they were fifty years ago? They are certainly eating more polyunsaturated oils: in Australia in 1995 I saw that even the cream on milk was removed and replaced with vegetable oil.

Victims of the disease have been found to have polyunsaturated oils in their skin cells.

Polyunsaturated oils are oxidised readily by ultra-violet radiation from the sun and form harmful 'free radicals'. These are known to damage the cell's DNA and this can lead to the deregulation we call cancer.

Saturated fats are stable. They do not oxidise and form free radicals.

Malignant melanoma is also said to be increasing in this country. Does the sun cause this? In Britain the number of sufferers is so small as to be relatively insignificant. Even so, it is not likely that the sun is to blame since all the significant increase is in the over-seventy-five-year-olds.

People in this age group tend to get very little sun.

That the sun is not to blame is confirmed by other findings:

Melanoma occurs ten times as often in Orkney and Shetland than it does on Mediterranean islands.

In Scotland, for example, there are five times as many melanomas on the feet as on the hands; and in Japan, forty per cent of pedal melanomas are on the soles of the feet . (13)

Polyunsaturated fats promote cancer

Many laboratories have shown that diets high in polyunsaturated fatty acids promote tumours. Cancer promotion is not the same as cancer causing. The subject is complex; suffice to say here that promoters are substances that help to speed up reproduction of existing cancer cells.

It has been known since the early 1970s that it is linoleic acid that is the major culprit. As Professor Raymond Kearney of Sydney University put it in 1987: 'Many laboratories have shown that a greater proportion of polyunsaturated fats are superior to diets rich in saturated fats in promoting the yield of experimental mammary tumours.

In such studies, omega-6 linoleic acid appeared to be the crucial fatty acid . . .' and 'Vegetable oils (eg Corn oil and sunflower oil) which are rich in linoleic acid are potent promoters of tumour growth.' (14)

Polyunsaturated fats and breast cancer

A study of 61,471 women aged forty to seventy-six, conducted in Sweden, looked into the relation of different fats and breast cancer. The results were published in January 1998.

This study found an inverse association with monounsaturated fat and a positive association with polyunsaturated fat. In other words, monounsaturated fats protected against breast cancer and polyunsaturated fats increased the risk. Saturated fats were neutral. (15)

Flora margarine, the brand leader, is thirty-nine percent linoleic acid; Vitalite and other 'own brand' polyunsaturated margarines are similar.

Of cooking oils, sunflower oil is fifty percent and safflower oil seventy-two percent linoleic acid.

Butter, on the other hand, has only a mere two percent and lard is just nine percent linoleic acid.

Linoleic acid is one of the essential fatty acids. We must eat some to live, but we do not need much. The amount in animal fats is quite sufficient.

Because of the heart disease risk from trans-fats in margarines, in 1994 the manufacturers of Flora changed its formula to cut out the trans fats and other manufacturers have since followed. But that still leaves the linoleic acid.

The anti-cancer fat

Linoleic acid is one of the essential fatty acids that our bodies need but cannot synthesise. We must eat some to survive. Fortunately there is one form of linoleic acid that is beneficial.

Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) differs from the normal form of linoleic acid only in the position of two of the bonds that join its atoms. But this small difference has been shown to give it powerful anti-cancer properties.

Scientists at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, New York (16) and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New Jersey Medical School, (17) showed that even at concentrations of less than one percent, CLA in the diet is protective against several cancers including breast cancer, colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma.

Conjugated linoleic acid has one other difference from the usual form — it is not found in vegetables but in the fat of ruminant animals. The best sources are dairy products and the fat on red meat, principally beef. (18)

It has been suggested that the consumption of red meat increases the risk of colon cancer, yet in Britain there is no evidence to support this. (19) It is interesting that all the evidence implicating red meat in cancer comes from the USA — where they cut the fat off.

Conclusions Saturated fats and animal fats are usually blamed for all manner of diseases in Western society. But look at the facts:

In the 19th-century, when animal fats were all that was available, cancers were rare (as was heart disease).

Polyunsaturated fats and oils are used to suppress the immune system, such immunosuppression is known to cause cancers to start and promote cancer.

In this last century there has been a change in favour of polyunsaturated fats and oils — and cancer rates have soared.

Unfortunately, as polyunsaturated fatty acids are also essential to the body; we must have some. So a proper balance must be struck. Whether the dramatic increase in the numbers of cancers in the last century was as a result of a similarly dramatic rise in our intake of polyunsaturated vegetable oils is not known — but the evidence strongly favours such a conclusion.

Under the circumstances, it seems prudent to get what linoleic acid we need from animal sources. Or to restrict polyunsaturated oil consumption so that linoleic acid is no more than three percent of the total fat intake.

References 1. Gofman, J W, et al. The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. Science 1950; 111: 166-181, 186
2. Keys A. Atherosclerosis: a problem in newer public health. J Mt Sinai Hosp 1953; 20: 118-139.
3. Mann G V. Diet-heart: End of an Era. New Eng J Med . 1977; 297: 644.
4. Carroll K K. Dietary fats and cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53: 1064S.
5. France T, Brown P. Test-tube cancers raise doubts over fats. New Scientist , 7 December 1991, p 12.
6. Newsholme E A. Mechanism for starvation suppression and refeeding activity of infection. Lancet 1977; i: 654.
7. Miller JD, et al. Br Med J 1973; i: 765.
8. Uldall PR, et al . Lancet 1974; ii: 514.
9. Pearce M L, Dayton S. Incidence of cancer in men on a diet high in polyunsaturated fat. Lancet 1971; i: 464.
10. American Heart Association Monograph, No 25. 1969.
11. Nauts HC. Cancer Research Institute Monograph No 18. 1984, p 91.
12. Mackie BS. Med J Austr 1974; 1: 810.
13. Karnauchow PN. Melanoma and sun exposure. Lancet 1995; 346: 915.
14. Kearney R. Promotion and prevention of tumour growth — effects of endotoxin, inflammation and dietary lipids. Int Clin Nutr Rev 1987; 7: 157.
15. Wolk A, et al. A Prospective Study of Association of Monounsaturated Fat and Other Types of Fat With Risk of Breast Cancer. Arch Intern Med . 1998; 158: 41-45
16. Ip C, Scimeca J A, Thompson H J. Conjugated linoleic acid. A powerful anticarcinogen from animal fat sources. Cancer 1994; 74(3 Suppl): 1050-4.
17. Shultz T D, Chew B P, Seaman W R, Luedecke L O. Inhibitory effect of conjugated dienoic derivatives of linoleic acid and beta-carotene on the in vitro growth of human cancer cells. Cancer Letters 1992; 63: 125-133.
18. Lin H, Boylston TD, Chang MJ, Luedecke LO, Schultz TD. Survey of the conjugated linoleic acid contents of dairy products. J Dairy Sci . 1995; 78: 2358-65.
19. Cox BD, Whichelow MJ. Frequent consumption of red meat is not a risk factor for cancer. Br Med J 1997; 315: 1018.

This Report was last updated 24 March 2001




Maternal deaths linked to obesity

Obesity is the fastest growing cause of women dying in pregnancy or childbirth in the UK, a report shows.

More than half the 295 women who died during or after pregnancy between 2003 and 2005 were overweight or obese. Experts say the number of deaths - from a total of two million pregnancies - is low but the trend is very worrying.


BBC News web site The Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths (CEMACH) report calls for more support and advice for obese women before and during pregnancy.

Gwyneth Lewis, CEMACH director and the government's maternity tsar, said the figures showed that childbirth was very safe in the UK.

But she said the growing evidence of a link to obesity was a cause for concern.

Graph: BMI at a glance Please go to the bottom of this story.

The figures suggest that a modest amount of extra weight in pregnancy carries little extra risk, but obesity poses a significant problem.

Fifteen per cent of the mothers who died were morbid or super-morbidly obese.

Dr Lewis said: "Obese pregnant women are probably at four or five times greater risk of suffering maternal death than a woman of normal weight - and the same for their babies dying."

She is concerned many women are not aware of the risk associated with obesity.

Overall, the UK has one of the lowest rates of maternal death in the world. However, the death rate in the UK has begun to rise. In 2003-05 it stood at almost 13.95 per 100,000 births, up from 13.07 in 2000-02, and just 9.83 in 1985-87.

With obesity levels predicted to soar experts say it is vital that women are fully aware they should try to get to a healthy weight before trying to conceive.

The report says excess weight not only puts a woman at risk of medical complications, it can mask symptoms and cause logistical problems.

In one case, there was a delay in spotting that a woman was at risk of seizures, because a blood pressure cuff could not fit around her arm.

New equipment

At the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Gateshead, consultant obstetricians are already seeing a shift in their clinics and delivery suites.

Dr Helene Brandon said around a third of the pregnant mothers they see are obese, and in an average year they care for several women with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 50.

That would place those women in the highest risk category of super-morbidly obese.

The maternity unit has had to buy a new operating table that can hold up to 40 stone (254kg) in weight.

It is regularly in use, as around half of obese pregnant women end up having a Caesarean section.

The operation usually requires at least one extra assistant for the surgeon to help manage the bulk of the patient.

Dr Brandon said obese patients face higher risks of certain complications.

She said: "The most common ones are dangerously high blood pressure, heart disease such as angina which could cause a heart attack in pregnancy - and obese patients are much more prone to bleeding."

Struggle with weight

Several miles away on an estate in Jarrow one of her patients, Maria Thornton is working hard to reduce the risks to herself and her baby.

Maria is six months pregnant and weighs 19-and-a-half stone (124kg). She has had a lifelong struggle with her weight, and had gastric band surgery several years ago.

In her last pregnancy, Maria developed diabetes because of her weight, which brought home to her the risks to her own health from obesity.

Although she is now well informed about the potential health problems Maria is shocked that obesity is emerging as a factor in maternal deaths.

She said: "It is really quite scary. You know there are risks, but you don't think of them in terms of fatality - you kind of think it makes the pregnancy harder or you've got more obstacles to overcome.

"But to hear that it can cost you your life at the end of the day is quite frightening."

Now Maria is going several times a week to the sure start scheme in Perth Green to use the gym. As a result of regular exercise she has only put on three pounds (1.36kg) in this pregnancy, following the medical advice that obese women should aim to maintain their weight.







What do you think?. Do you have any experiences of this? Send us your comments or request more information using the form below.

What do you think?
Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.
First Name*
E-mail Address*
Street Address
Country*
Home Phone
Fax
Your say!





Vitamin levels to low.



I read something the other day that we should all be worried about…

An independent panel of 23 health experts in America concluded that the American government’s “recommended daily allowance” RDA of vitamins and minerals is much too low.

In a statement released on October 30th, the Independent Vitamin Safety Review Panel wrote,

“Government-sponsored nutrient recommendations, such as the US RDA/DRIs, are not keeping pace with recent progress in nutrition research... Inadequate [nutritional] intake, and inadequate standards to judge intake, have resulted in widespread nutrient inadequacy, chronic disease, and an undernourished but overweight population.”1

They went on to point out that a host of scientific studies prove that heart disease, cancer, and even mental illness can be prevented simply by using nutritional supplements.

They also sounded the bell on whole foods versus processed foods.

They wrote:

“People have been led to believe that they can get all the nutrients they need from a ‘balanced diet’ of processed foods. That is not true. For adequate vitamin and mineral intake, a diet of unprocessed, whole foods, along with the intelligent use of nutritional supplements, is more than just a good idea: it is essential.”

What’s more, they listed specific vitamins and minerals I use every day, including B-vitamins, vitamins C and D, and the minerals selenium, zinc, magnesium, and chromium. These nutrients have enormous healing power.

They can apparently:

· Lower blood pressure

· Boost brainpower and heart health

· Improve mood

· Strengthen your immune system

· Ward off brittle bones and muscle fatigue

· Prevent or reverse diabetes

· Eliminate arthritis, joint pain, and inflammation

· Prevent Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis

· Increase libido and performance


So in light of this new information, I think you know what we should all do now?

Here’s a list of what is now being recommended as compared to the USRDA.

Nutrient USRDA Recommended RDA

Vitamin C 60 mg Recommended 1,000 - 3,000 mg

Vitamin D 400 IEU Recommended 1,000 – 5,000 IEU

Chromium 35 mcg Recommended 200 mcg

Zinc 15 mg Recommended 30 mg


You can see from the chart that there’s quite a difference in the quantities. And, taking these additional amounts can make quite a difference in your health too. Wishing you the greatest health possible.

Robert A. Broad. Email: robert@weightloss-world.com





FORMULA 2 MULTIVITAMIN COMPLEX A daily multivitamin for long-term good health.*

Key Benefits

Essential nutrients and antioxidants for long-term good health and vitality:* Helps maintain the health of bones, skin, hair and the immune system:* Supports healthy weight management.*

Stress, a poor diet and exposure to pollutants can rob your body of essential nutrients. As a result, you may look and feel tired, get sick easily or have difficulty losing excess weight. Formula 2 supplies a range of important vitamins and minerals, plus select herbs, to promote overall well-being.*

Usage

Take Formula 2 Multivitamin Complex in combination with Formula 1 Nutritional Shake Mix and Formula 3 Personalized Protein Powder. Note: Accidental overdose of iron-containing products is a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under age 6. Keep this product out of reach of children. In case of accidental overdose, call a doctor or poison-control center immediately.



Formula 2 Complete Multivitamins €18.55
Formula 2 Complete Multivitamins GBP £23,00

You won't believe how good you can feel!
Learn more about the Shapeworks Quickstart program with protein by clicking on the image. Tens of Millions of people have already benefited by using this programme, you can too. The beauty of this programme is that it will help you to shed weight and inches and it's guaranteed so you can't fail.

ORDER NOW! and make 2008 your best year ever.


What do you think?
Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.
First Name*
E-mail Address*
Street Address
Country*
Home Phone
Fax
Your say!



Organic food 'better' for heart!



Organic fruit and vegetables may be better for you than conventionally grown crops, US research suggests.

A ten-year study comparing organic tomatoes with standard produce found almost double the level of flavonoids - a type of antioxidant.

Flavonoids have been shown to reduce high blood pressure, lowering the risk of heart disease and stroke.

Writing in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, the team said nitrogen in the soil may be the key.

Dr Alyson Mitchell, a food chemist at the University of California, and colleagues measured the amount of two flavonoids - quercetin and kaempferol - in dried tomato samples that had been collected as part of a long-term study on agricultural methods.



They found that on average they were 79% and 97% higher respectively in the organic tomatoes than in the conventionally grown fruit.

New Scientist magazine reported that the different levels of flavonoids in tomatoes are probably due to the absence of fertilisers in organic farming.

Flavonoids are produced as a defence mechanism that can be triggered by nutrient deficiency, such as a lack of nitrogen in the soil.

The inorganic nitrogen in conventional fertiliser is easily available to plants and so, the researchers suggests, the lower levels of flavonoids are probably caused by over-fertilisation.

Conflicting evidence

Flavonoids have also been linked with reduced rates of some types of cancer and dementia.

The Food Standards Agency says there is some evidence that flavonoids can help to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and they are currently carrying out a study to look at the health benefits in more detail.

However, a spokesperson said there was no evidence that organic food was healthier.

"Our long-standing advice on organic food is there can be some nutrient differences but it doesn't mean it's necessarily better for you."

For example, a recent study found that organic milk had higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids, but the FSA points out that these short-chain fatty acids do not seem to have the health promoting benefits offered by long-chain omega-3 oils found in oily fish.

Peter Melchett, Soil Association policy director said: "We welcome the now rapidly growing body of evidence which shows significant differences between the nutritional composition of organic and non-organic food.

"This is the second recent American study to find significant differences between organic and non-organic fruit.

"These findings also confirm recent European research, which showed that organic tomatoes, peaches and processed apples all have higher nutritional quality than non-organic."

"As further scientific evidence emerges from new research looking at differences between organic and non-organic food, the Soil Association will be asking the FSA to keep their nutritional advice to consumers under review."

Mediterranean diet extends life


Drinking red wine and cooking with olive oil may help us to live longer, say scientists.

They have found that key ingredients in both substances can significantly increase the lifespan of yeast.

Since yeast and humans share many genes, scientists have speculated they may have the same effect in people.

The findings provide more evidence to suggest that the Mediterranean diet may be the secret to living a long and healthy life.

Key molecule

The scientists, from Harvard Medical School and Biomol research laboratory in Philadelphia, have identified resveratrol as the key ingredient in red wine.

This molecule is abundant in red wine. It gives red wine its anti-cancer and anti-heart disease properties.


They have found that this molecule can influence genes that have been linked to lifespan in yeast.

The found that quercetin, which is abundant in olive oil, has a similar effect.

In particular, they affect those genes that have been shown to extend life as a result of a calorie-restricted diet by enabling cells to live longer.

In the case of resveratrol it was found to extend the life of some yeast cells by as much as 70%.

Previous studies have suggested that severe calorie restriction can increase the lifespan of organisms like yeast, fruit flies, worms and rats.

Scientists are trying to develop drugs that could have a similar impact on humans. The discovery that resveratrol and quercetin can increase the lifespan in yeast could boost those efforts.

"It is early days but we consider this to be a really striking breakthrough," Dr Konrad Howitz, one of the authors of the study, told BBC News Online.

"It certainly brings us closer to being able to intervene pharmacologically in humans to extend longevity."

The scientists found that resveratrol could increase the lifespan of yeast cells in a variety of doses.

However, similar tests on human cells showed that dosage is important.

"A very broad range of doses were very effective in yeast. However, it was different with human cells.

"There appeared to be a very narrow range at the low end. If doses were too high they appeared to have the opposite effect," said Dr Howitz.

The scientists are planning similar tests on other species, including mice, to see if the molecules can extend their life. "I think it highlights the potential health benefits of the Mediterranean diet," he said.

The study is published in the journal Nature.

Figures from the European Union show that people living in Mediterranean countries like Spain and Italy can expect to live longer on average than people in other countries.

Average life expectancy in Spain is 75 for men and 83 for women. This compares to the UK, where men can expect to live until they are 75 but women can expect to live to 80.

In the US, average life expectancy is 74 for men and 80 for women.
What do you think?
Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.
First Name*
E-mail Address*
Street Address
Country*
Home Phone
Fax
Your say!


footer for news page